>
> jim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> > Behalf Of Tom M. Yeh
> > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:04 AM
> > To: Jboss-Development
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Please s
No, JBoss doesn't support option B.
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityMultiInstanceSynchronizationInterceptor passivates entity
beans for both option B and C (at line 110-130). On the other hand, the specs said "in
option B, the Container caches a 'ready' instance between transaction" (pp. 186), an
Dear All,
According to the CSIRO report (http://www.cmis.csiro.au/adsat/jboss.htm), JBoss is
doing well with Stateless session beans. It implies reflection, by comparing to static
compiled codes, doesn't affect the performance much, while it has great architectural
advantages such as pluggab
Bill,
Did you put this patch into your schedule? I checked the recent CVS tree and found
nothing about it. Thanks.
Tom
> Tom,
>
> Ok, I know what you need. Give me a few.
>
> Bill kx"
>¨ºj.Û(}Æ}è§jס¶ÚþØbH zG(û %º,±×¯zZ)éí¨¥x%ËIn,uëÞfz{eËl²«qç讧zØm¶?þX¬¶Ë(º· ~
