I have also no problem with the version of Eclipse that u mentioned in your
email...It works for me with JDK 1.5.
I added the following in the VM arguments dialog-box
under RUN->RUN Menu
Arguments Tab
-javaagent:C:\dev-applications\jboss-aop_1.0.0-FINAL\lib-50\jboss-aop-jdk50.jar
-Djboss
Which version of Eclipse does support JDK 1.5 ?
I am curious because I have being using NETBEANS for a couple of
months because it was one of the first IDE to provide a full support
of JDK 1.5.I use NETBEANS with JBOSS-AOP without any issue.
To go back to your question with Eclipse ,VM arguments c
Does the new release of JBoss Portal support parallel execution of
processAction or/and parallel execution of the Render request ?
Thx-Claude
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855993#3855993
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?
Any plan to support per class scope for Introduction in the near future ?
Thx Claude
FYI.,what Aspectwerkz does in this area :
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854707#3854707
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o
1/Yes.The asynchronous aspects does support timeout value.
With jdk1.4,u have two options to specify the value:
* In your code,when u flag the method as an asynchronous method
/** @@org.jboss.aspects.asynchronous.aspects.jboss.Asynchronous
(timeout=5000)*/
public long myProcess(){...}
Running the Asynchronous Aspect or any others aspects outside of JBOSS server
is quite straitghforward.
They are differents options of deployment based on your requirements (See
Reference doc Chap 10)
I personally tested two configurations with Tomcat 5.0
JDK 1.4 using the precompiler.
--
!class($instanceof{org.jboss.aspects.jmx.ReflectedMBean}) AND (has(*
*->@org.jboss.aspects.jmx.ManagedResource(..)) OR
class(@org.jboss.aspects.jmx.ManagedMBean))"
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3845764#3845764
Reply to the post :
http://www.
1/OK for the workaround.
Do u think that the scope for a Mixin class could not be supported
at the infrastructure level ?(future version of JBOSS-AOP)
2/ Thx .It does work...FYI ,the full expression for my user-case.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=vi
1/Is there a way to apply a mixin class at the class level and not
only at the instance level ?
2/It looks like that the same mixin class can be instantiated more than
once per instance based on class inheritance.
For example :
if the class A inherits from class B and both supposed to have atta
Marc,
I am certainly not getting your question.
Are u asking for user-case to justify the use of asynchronous call
versus synchronous call ?
Thx-Claude
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831646#3831646
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.or
Thx Bill for your fix in CVS.
The Introduction Annotation is now working with the pre-compiler in addtion of the
classloader option.
Thx-Claude
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831515#3831515
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/
Some documentation about AOP Asynchronous Method Invocation
available on the WIKI.
http://jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=AOPAsynchronousMethodInvocation
Rgds,Claude
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831238#3831238
Reply to the post :
http://www.j
Are the asynchronous aspects related in any way to the remoting framework or are they
entirely in VM.
=> same JVM.Can run within a web-container with JBOSS-AOP standalone.
Claude, which area of JMS would you like to contribute to?
=> POJO face on JMS. But need a rest before and write some docum
I have just completed an aspect dealing with asynchronous call.
So the purpose of the asynchronous aspect is to drastically simplify the
implementation of asynchronous call within a JVM .
The asynchrous aspect can be used to define ONEWAY method
BUT also REQUEST/REPLY method.
Timeout value ,ex
NP! Thx for your reply.
Let me know when u're planning to support an interceptor chain
in a separate thread.I will be happy to do a beta tester !
My aim is to be able to support asynchronous call for POJO
as follow:
public class MyBusinessLogic
{
public someParameters someBusinessLogic(
Two questions a old one and new one.
1/I don't see how I can get information on the calling method
for a caller pointcut.
2/If I call "Object res=invocation.invokeNext();" in a separate
thread the same method is going to be intercepted again and the code
is looping. How can I solve my problem ?
I have looked at how to answer to my second question (The easiest one ;-))
The class advised for a Caller pointcut is the calling class.
I didn't find a way to get a handle on this class within the implementation of
the Interceptor.So ,by adding the following code within the invokeCaller
method fr
I have 2 questions regarding the lastest code from CVS
that I am currently testing.
1/How to define a caller pointcut as follows
I want to intercept every instanciation of the constructor
of the class A when it's called within method B or constructor B
2/How can I get information of the caller
18 matches
Mail list logo
