[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Using JBossAS 4.0.1 as Server

2005-02-15 Thread phancox
As some of this needs to be in production ASAP, I will probably go with JBossWS from 4.0.1 Seems like I need to be working with a bit too much beta/alpha code by the time I get all the dependencies resolved for remoting. Hopefully have another look at remoting in a couple of months time. Thank

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Using JBossAS 4.0.1 as Server

2005-02-14 Thread phancox
Thanks for your response Tom. If I were to stick with remoting as delivered in JBoss AS 4.0.1, what would be the downside (as opposed to using the remoting 1.0.1beta)? I understand there are some changes around the transports that will be available in future? My initial target implementation in

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Using JBossAS 4.0.1 as Server

2005-02-13 Thread phancox
I have successfully used the stand-alone implementation of remoting 1.0.1 beta in a prototype and now want to replace the stand-alone server with JBoss AS 4.0.1 Research / trial and error led me to the need to replace jboss-common.jar in {JBOSS_HOME}\lib with the one distributed with the stand-