[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: TimeOutException using 1.1 with fragmented cache

2004-09-03 Thread smievoll
Pretty shure they see each other, can't see anything indicating the opposite. The boxes are connected to the same switch. Ended up with FD_SIMPLE just as an experiment, we've tried about a zillion different configurations. Things didn't work any better with FD. The configs are here: http://ww

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: TimeOutException using 1.1 with fragmented cache

2004-09-02 Thread smievoll
I have the logs but they're rather large so I put them here: http://www.conduct.no/~bos/jc/. Can't say I find anything that explains the three minute lag between the distribution of each node, but it seems that 11 does not respond to 12s FD_SIMPLE ARE_YOU_ALIVE requests just as it the puts are

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: TimeOutException using 1.1 with fragmented cache

2004-09-02 Thread smievoll
If you look at the log-excerpts you see that both cache instances reports having accepted the new view (containing just the two machines) about four minutes before I try to create the nodes. I've implemented state merging using the TreeCacheListener interface catching MergeViews, and that seems

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - TimeOutException using 1.1 with fragmented cache

2004-09-02 Thread smievoll
I'm trying to set up a fault tolerant JBossCache configuration in a WAN environment, but am experiencing a few difficulties. The current setup is 4 machines that is to be split between two locations, but currently they're connected together in a test configuration using two simple switches. Aft