bwang00 wrote : Well, the log says obj is non-advisable:
|
| | 2004-09-14 17:23:38,946 DEBUG [main] aop.TreeCacheAop (TreeCacheAop.java:281)
- putObject(): obj is non-advisable.
| | 2004-09-14 17:23:38,946 DEBUG [main] cache.TreeCache (TreeCache.java:2336) -
_put(null,
If you are running under Tomcat, it'd be best to use aopc to pre-compile your
advisable object. Check into the example in build.xml of aopc. That way, at least, you
take the class loader out of the picture.
-Ben
View the original post :
Well, the log says obj is non-advisable:
| 2004-09-14 17:23:38,946 DEBUG [main] aop.TreeCacheAop (TreeCacheAop.java:281) -
putObject(): obj is non-advisable.
| 2004-09-14 17:23:38,946 DEBUG [main] cache.TreeCache (TreeCache.java:2336) -
_put(null, /aop/expresso/CacheManager/cacheLists,
You will still need jboss-aop to declare your object, UnOrderedCache, to be
aspectized. Otherwise, aop will treat it as a regular object of which requires
Serializable, and furthermore will not breakdown the object graph for UnOrderedCache.
-Ben
View the original post :
bwang00 wrote : You will still need jboss-aop to declare your object,
UnOrderedCache, to be aspectized. Otherwise, aop will treat it as a regular object of
which requires Serializable, and furthermore will not breakdown the object graph for
UnOrderedCache.
|
| -Ben
Thanks for your
Forget about the map and list. Why don't you do a putObject on UnderedCache to see if
it gets replicated correctly?
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3848097#3848097
Reply to the post :
... one additional comment. 'cachelists' in the code sample is a Map instance to which
an UnOrderedCache instance is added
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847974#3847974
Reply to the post :
