Last q: yes. Replication and eviction are orthogonal.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3848103#3848103
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3848103
I am not explicitly demarcating transactions, and I am using synchronous replication
(though to be fair I tried async, which was not noticeably faster). My full cache XML
is as follows:
jboss:service=Naming
jboss:service=TransactionManager
So you
#1 do *not* use transactions
#2 use repl sync
#1 disables bundling of modifications, therefore you get more traffic across the wire
(after *each* modification)
#2 is *much* slower than async replication
It would help if you have a small test case, zipped up and including the
Bela,
Thanks for the insight. You are correct in that I am not currently using
transactions, but if I were, I would simply have a begin and commit surrounding every
put operation, so I'm not sure I would accrue any tangible benefits.
I will see if I can mock a small test case that
WHAT props do you use for the cache itself ? Asycn/sync repl ? Do you begin/commit a
TX after each op, or after multiple ops ?
Bela
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3847928#3847928
Reply to the post :
