[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Admin Console] - Re: New approach for updating Datasource/Drivers via Admin C

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : If we fall back to the "traditional" jboss view, then: | | 1) Invoking on a template for copying static libs into ./lib is not the best way. It'd be more straightforward to have on the DeploymentService something like: | | | String[] listStaticLibs(); |

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Admin Console] - Re: New approach for updating Datasource/Drivers via Admin C

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A view of the static libs is not an admin view. An admin may not even know that a datasource has a jdbc driver jar. You have to make a distinction between a package and the installation of that package. A package is a self contained collection of descriptors, jars, os libs, etc. that needs to be

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Admin Console] - Re: New approach for updating Datasource/Drivers via Admin C

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we fall back to the "traditional" jboss view, then: 1) Invoking on a template for copying static libs into ./lib is not the best way. It'd be more straightforward to have on the DeploymentService something like: | String[] listStaticLibs(); | boolean uploadStaticLib(URL url); | (This

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Admin Console] - Re: New approach for updating Datasource/Drivers via Admin C

2005-01-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, this is the correct approach. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3864243#3864243 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3864243 --- This SF.