IdleRemover is a static instance that runs a single remover thread for all
pools.
To override the implementation would require an IdleRemoveFactory
and a global configuration somewhere in jbossjca-service.xml
Why do you need to change it? All it does it callback to the registered pool
on a timeo
I would be prepared to accept a modification that allows the internal pool
classname to be specified on the ManagedConnectionPool.
In fact there are three configurations that are hardwired and need exposing
in -ds.xml for more advanced use cases:
| Defines the ManagedConnectionPool implementat
On your immediate problem, it seems to that what is really required is the
ability
define a plugin for the remover logic in InternalManagedConnectionPool.
Something like:
| com.acme.RemoverPolicy
|
| - if (cl.isTimedOut(timeout))
| + if (removerPolicy.isTimedOut(cl,
In anycase. What feature are you adding?
If it is generically useful, this could be added to the base implementation
rather than needing all this factory/plugins complication.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3865913#3865913
Reply to the post :
h
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : In anycase. What feature are you adding?
| If it is generically useful, this could be added to the base implementation
| rather than needing all this factory/plugins complication.
I belive that it is generically useful and would be appreciated by community.
Basicly,
I still don't see why you need to change the IdleRemover.
If the aged timeout is less than the idle timeout, you pass that as the
interval.
It just means it is going to make more frequent calls to removedTimeOut.
There is no loss here since it just checks one connection (the oldest unused)
to se
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : I still don't see why you need to change the
IdleRemover.
|
| If the aged timeout is less than the idle timeout, you pass that as the
interval.
| It just means it is going to make more frequent calls to removedTimeOut.
|
Right. But IdleRemover makes addition
Do you have a sourceforge id?
If you do I will get you cvs access where you can prototype your ideas in
jboss-head
(the development branch which will become JBoss5).
Make sure you read the developers guide on coding standards (they are not the
same as Sun's guidelines), cvs branches, etc.
Also
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Do you have a sourceforge id?
|
| If you do I will get you cvs access where you can prototype your ideas in
jboss-head
| (the development branch which will become JBoss5).
|
My id is 'andreitar'.
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Make sure you read the developers
