[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Mail API

2005-03-13 Thread jfrosch
Is there a reason why JBoss Mail shouldn't adopt the Apache James Mailet / Matcher API? It seems well documented and is a stable, well thought out API for e-mail workflow processing. Honestly, I've looked at (am still looking at) James as an e-mail server solution for an upcoming project. I

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Mail API

2005-03-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look, there is very next to no chance we'll use anything from JAMES. The pieces we DID use from JAMES are being ripped out because they didn't profile well (namely the layered streams). The mailet API may be well documented but its frankly not that good. Furthermore the goal is very

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Mail API

2005-03-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would however encourage an affirmative and positive What I'm looking for. No one will make you use mail scripting. Just because YOU don't see value in it doesn't mean others (me for instance) won't. I intend to SYNDICATE my spam catch scripts and AGGREGATE those of others in my trust

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Mail API

2005-02-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well BeanShell or whatever is fine so far as scripting but no matter what we cannot avoid bindings. Meaning supplying WHAT objects should be managed. JSR-223 seems not perscriptive so far as the scripting langauge. I'm not against that, but we should have something preferred. I originally