[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: What to work on

2005-03-16 Thread spiritualmechanic
Hello Ovidiu. I've looked over the remoting stuff. Which Handler(s) do you expect to have, and how many? Will you expose the JMS facade directly over the remoting API (i.e. use a Remoting Client to use JMS) or are the remote handlers just for JMS-JMS communication? As in, between servers that

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: What to work on

2005-03-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This thread continues at http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870417#3870417 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3870418#3870418 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3870418

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: What to work on

2005-03-16 Thread spiritualmechanic
Actually, above you say: As for the communication between remote clients and server peers, I will use Tom Elrod's Remoting. So it seems that the Remoting is just for clients wanting to use Messaging outside of the JMS API? Or will you create a JMS client as well? View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: What to work on

2005-03-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remoting is used behind the JMS API. Use case: Your client code looks up a ConnectionFactory in JNDI and it uses it to create a Connection. The ConectionFactory implementation (which delegates to a dynamic proxy) will use Remoting to connect to a server pair, which will create a

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: What to work on

2005-03-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So nice of you to pitch in! The Messaging Core (even it it can use a lot of refactoring and addition of new features) is not the highest priority right now. The critical part, at this moment, is the JMS facade. Once it is done, it will allow us to release an alpha, which people can download