[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ordered (re) delivery etc.. / ebMS

2005-04-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anonymous wrote : Besides that, I have no idea how the TreeSet would be passed this new comparator, let alone a comnfigurable comparator. | Look at how ReceiversImpl is configured. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3873802#3873802 Reply to the

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ordered (re) delivery etc.. / ebMS

2005-04-13 Thread kukeltje
anonymous wrote : JBossMQ already has redelivery delay/count I know, the specs (and comment in the jboss code) specifically state however that ordered delivery of redelivered messages is not gueranteed. This would be a first addition I think. Bea also does this and mentiones this as a unique se

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: ordered (re) delivery etc.. / ebMS

2005-03-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"kukeltje" wrote : Hi, | | I've been working with Hermes, the freebXML ebMS server. They have developed lots of things that are already in J2EE (like transactions, a connectionpool) for resons beyond *my* comprehension. Users say they just want to be able to run it in a simple servlet engin