[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-22 Thread B.S.Navin (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315645 ] B.S.Navin commented on JGRP-31: --- But a fix that would automatically make the merge (by either using the merge protocol or an additional protocol) looks more inline with the genera

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-22 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315624 ] Bela Ban commented on JGRP-31: -- This is configurable (you can switch it off via a property). I'd use the file system and temp storage. > Problem with MERGE2 when not using multica

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-22 Thread Scott M Stark (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315623 ] Scott M Stark commented on JGRP-31: --- Having a requirement for a persistent store and the associated services (db server, writable disk, etc.) seems like a bad minimum requirem

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-20 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315542 ] Bela Ban commented on JGRP-31: -- In this case, the timeout for purging of idle members in the persistent cache should be higher than the longest anticipated network partition. We c

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-19 Thread B.S.Navin (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315541 ] B.S.Navin commented on JGRP-31: --- Using a temp persistence store may not solve the issue. The issue would crop up if the network issue (or whatever caused the group to split) gets

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-19 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315540 ] Bela Ban commented on JGRP-31: -- I actually had in mind to use a little temp persistence store which would store the approximate membership (including mnop). Elements here would sim

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-19 Thread Igor Rud (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315539 ] Igor Rud commented on JGRP-31: -- Hello! We have the same problem, that you described in the issue. If you have patch for JGroups and it is not private, may I probably ask you to p

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-02-17 Thread B.S.Navin (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315513 ] B.S.Navin commented on JGRP-31: --- One more possible solution (a more generic one) would be to create a small protocol that sits between TCPPING & its underlying layer (UDP / TCP) th

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JGRP-31) Problem with MERGE2 when not using multicast

2005-01-31 Thread B.S.Navin (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-31?page=comments#action_12315095 ] B.S.Navin commented on JGRP-31: --- Possible solution: -- There is one possible solution I found to this: The merge() method in the org.jgroups.protocols.pbcast.Coor