We'll also want to make it compatible with Exchange folders ultimately which probably
means SMB (aka CIFS) of some sort.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3828652#3828652
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
acoliver wrote:
Thanks Sergey, I think you're dead on with the specific issues with mail storage. I disagree with the YAMS sentiment, in that each mail server have issues and I've not yet found one that I like. Granted I'm sure some folks will eventually investigate us and not like what we're do
"acoliver" wrote : "but finishing SMTP before we start universal storage is a
mistake".
:-)
It's not my words. I mean - it's no necessary to make M1 of mailserver without any new
features.
But you're programmers, so you may know the project's life cycle better.
I didn't say drop the SMTP or d
universal storage is a great idea --- bringing folks into closer contact with their
data instead of hiding it in legacy hierarchical non-secure non-transactional
non-indexed non-relational file systems, and jboss is probably the place to do it. i
think you've identified something pretty useful.
So what I meant to say (after reading it sounded more like I was shooting you down
than honing you in) was enthusiastically document the idea, I love to hear more about
it. At the same time, lets not put the cart before the horse: "but finishing SMTP
before we start universal storage is a mist
"SergeyZh" wrote :
| So universal storage can provide us the way to store all user's information by any
supported protocol (SMTP, POP, IMAP, others). I prefer to have all my information in
one place and I think mailserver is the best choice for that.
|
Right, but we're not having that to
"acoliver" wrote :
| I wanted a running mail server as close to day one as possible.
|
I think it's general mistake, sorry.
I shall repeat: I have enough choice for JUST email server, so not necessary to rush
to make just another server.
It should be coolest and greatest server. It should
Oh as Bill said, if you have specific requirements that would be SOOO awesome!
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3825958#3825958";>View
the original post
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3825958>Reply
to the post
Thanks Sergey, I think you're dead on with the specific issues with mail storage. I
disagree with the YAMS sentiment, in that each mail server have issues and I've not
yet found one that I like. Granted I'm sure some folks will eventually investigate us
and not like what we're doing, but ultim
Sergey,
Please post your requirements for Mail Services in a separate topic and get a
discussion going. Andy really needs feedback from System Admins to make this project
successful.
Thanks for your time!
Bill
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3825948#3825948";>View
t
10 matches
Mail list logo
