[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JBoss 3.2.4 and Nukes status

2004-06-06 Thread sgwood
anonymous wrote : What version of JBoss should Nukes 1.1 be aiming for? 3.2.3 only? Both versions? Any feelings on this? If the differences are minimal, I would say that we need to have versions of Nukes for JBoss 3.2.3 and 3.2.4. Sherman View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JBoss 3.2.4 and Nukes status

2004-06-06 Thread jae77
i took a look at some of this last night, and i don't think they are all trivial updates. i think we should aim to have the 1.1 release work w/ 3.2.3 and then worry about moving to 3.2.4 compatibility. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JBoss 3.2.4 and Nukes status

2004-06-05 Thread jae77
that class is missing from the jboss-jmx.jar in the root lib directory (not the one under /server/default/lib). according to cvs, the class was removed from the 3.2 branch when the jmx 1.2 was backported from the head. View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JBoss 3.2.4 and Nukes status

2004-06-05 Thread cooper
yes it needs some changes View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3837645#3837645 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3837645 --- This SF.Net email is