[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes 1.0

2004-03-12 Thread loweryr
Has anyone managed to get the source drop for 1.0.0 to compile under linux? I keep getting the following, (and I've tried the 1.0.0 released source, the snapshot, and head... I keep getting this: [xslt] : Fatal Error! java.lang.IllegalStateException: can't declare any more prefixes in

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes 1.0

2004-03-08 Thread mkural
Congratulations for the release of 1.0. God willing I will check it out pretty soon. For release are you planning the support for JSR-168? Is it going to be a 1.x release? And also, were you able to get in a dialogue with Brian from Liferay? Keep up the good work. a

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes 1.0

2004-03-08 Thread mkural
Oh by the way.. The strategy taken by the uPortal project can also be used in JBoss Nukes to support JSR-168. Basically what they are doing is that they are embedding Apache Pluto portlet container into their portal and using a portlet-to-channel adapter (channels are basically uPortal's

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes 1.0

2004-03-04 Thread cooper
the cvs has been tagged as Nukes_1_0, for now we don't branch. We don't add new features, we concentrate on fixing the other existing modules like you are doing for the News module. We will get out a 1.1 soon with the new modules. a

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes 1.0

2004-03-04 Thread thepriz
I am also going to target the downloads module for 1.1. It is comming along really nicely. It is taking me longer than I thought to have the beta because I went back and changed it to use templates. I am hoping to have an alpha version soon. It should contain everything but security (still have

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes 1.0

2004-03-04 Thread cooper
great this is what we need : functionnalities. a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3824279#3824279;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3824279Reply to the post/a