Looking at the build scripts, it could go in a theme specific SAR.
If folks think this is a good thing, it could go into the nukes.ear in the
nukes-lib.jar, so it is available as a general service. If this is the case, then the
templates should be called out in the MBean config in some way, so
i have a small concern over this...
while nukes does give ppl the flexibility to do things like this (and i think that is
a great feature), i feel this makes things more complicated as well.
now there are multiple templating mechanisms being used, which makes it makes it much
more difficult for
Personally, I would love Velocity based templates.
Joachim
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827431#3827431";>View
the original post
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3827431>Reply
to the post
---
Scaleability aside, I was attracted to Nukes because it seems to be a simple to use,
yet powerful, Java framework. I applaud that simplicity of use, and don't want to
make it "less attactive" to others.
OTH, Java is more powerful than PHP, and hence Nukes is more complex. Is the goal to
be a
There's another point to consider here as well.
Velocity is a well known templating system. You open the door to a sizeable crew of
Java developers by including it as an option within Nukes.
Also, the presentation layer aspect of Nukes is still a little esoteric. You can
consider this an uninfo
I think you should be able to add this as an option for people to install if they want
to use it. It doesn't have to be a core feature but if someone wants the ability to
use it why not have the option?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3830258#3
