Hi,
I've now written this. I'm getting timeouts on sourceforge.net trying to
submit the patch, I'll try again in an hour or so...
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:43:38PM -0600, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> Yep this package is an absolute requirement of CMP 2.0. The
> java.lang.reflect.Proxy package ca
Yep this package is an absolute requirement of CMP 2.0. The
java.lang.reflect.Proxy package can't generate a subclass of an abstract
class, and this is where BCEL could take over.
If you want to look into writing a replacement with BCEL that would be
very cool (they do have a sample dynamic p
I believe the one thing that the java.lang.reflect.Proxy won't do that
JBoss needs is to generate implementations of abstract classes (rather
than interfaces) this is important in a few places (EJB 2.0 CMP for one)
danch
Neale Swinnerton wrote:
> I've just submitted patch 517088 to completely
I've just submitted patch 517088 to completely remove the jboss proxy compiler
and replace it with use of java.lang.reflect.Proxy.
The BCEL looks pretty good for all sorts of stuff, but the JDK Proxy class
does everything that the JBoss one does.
An 'interesting' use of the BCEL would be to pos
When I was at marc's place last week I suggested changing to BCEL, as it
is actively maintained by the jakarta group, and it would be one less
moving part for us. He liked the idea, but neither of us have the time
right now to learn another tool. If you've got nothing better to work
on go fo
Good. That is basically the position that I have... well bad too, cause
I don't have time todo it at the moment either, but I think it should be
done eventually.
Perhaps there is someone out there looking for a relatively easy todo
task to help improve the quality of JBoss?
--jason
On Mon, 20
Any thoughts on replacing our proxy compiler with the Byte Code
Engineering Library, recently added to the list of Jakarta
sub-projects?
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-
