PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 12:22:25 -0700
Look at fixing it in head as there the BasicMBeanRegistry has been
restored,
but the default has been changed to JBossMBeanRegistry
I agree we are beyond the spec here. Queue Marc's dance :-)
Going boldly where no spec writer has gone, look like you are running
stupidly one arm up (left) right leg up behind you, look at the sky with
a stupid smile... wwwh! you are running!
tada! going beyond the spec,
marcf
a look at fixing this without breaking bug #592346
Regards,
Adrian
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:11:41 -0700
When one registers an MBean
-
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
Hi Scott,
This is the specs/RIs mechanism for maintaining the LoaderRepository,
although it is only implicitly
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Scott M Stark wrote:
This probably breaks the MLet processing. But then I think it
was already broken, MLets are URLClassLoaders not UCLs.
actually we detect ULR in the mlet code and register one UCL per URL in
case ULR is used...
-- Juha
by the MBeanServer/registry
which noops for a UnifiedClassLoader.
Then use add/removeUnifiedClassLoader() for the external management.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
Ok,
But I'm seeing failures in the MLet tests (before Scotts modificaiton).
I'll investigate...
Regards,
Adrian
From: Juha-P Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002
The Mlet had not been converted to the UnifiedLoaderRepository2.
Regards,
Adrian
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BasicMBeanRegistry and class loader MBeans
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 21:16:06 +0100
Ok,
But I'm seeing
When one registers an MBean that is a ClassLoader the BasicMBeanRegistry
adds it to the the default LoaderRepository. This breaks scoped class loading
of services, and it really seems to be out of the scope of functionality
that the BasicMBeanRegistry should assume. Really I don't see why the
