Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD hell
Scott M Stark wrote:
...
!ELEMENT loader-repository-config (ANY)
Does it make any difference if you leave the brackets off the ANY ?
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-elementdecl
--
Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd.
PGP Key ID
Scott M Stark wrote:
...
!ELEMENT loader-repository-config (ANY)
Does it make any difference if you leave the brackets off the ANY ?
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-elementdecl
--
Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd.
PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C
I am working on adding the ability to specify a loader repository to all
of the deployment types, and this adds a loader-repository element that
needs a mixed content type with a loader-repository-config element with
an ANY content type. This is needed because the loader-repository-config
depends
Is this for 4.0? I thought we were switching to XML schema for 4.0.
We could switch to schemas for 3.2 also.
-dain
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 11:50 AM, Scott M Stark wrote:
I am working on adding the ability to specify a loader repository to
all
of the deployment types, and this adds a
Use XML Schema.
--jason
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:50 AM, Scott M Stark wrote:
I am working on adding the ability to specify a loader repository to
all
of the deployment types, and this adds a loader-repository element that
needs a mixed content type with a loader-repository-config
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD hell
Use XML Schema.
--jason
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] DTD hell
Is this for 4.0? I thought we were switching to XML schema for 4.0.
We could switch to schemas for 3.2 also.
-dain
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
