WARNING this message is only for the brave :)
I've looked into Tyrex source more closely
First Tyrex decides if the transaction can be committed in 1 phase
(i.e. optimized commit) if not, it goes into 2pc.
In 2pc it does the following:
It calls prepare() method which does a bunch of things
1.
Hi,
Thanks for correcting your terminology to prepare, commit.
I am not a total expert but I'm pretty sure of this.
I think there is still a problem either with terminology or tyrex.
Heuristics are used _only_ when the transaction manager loses contact with
one of the parties to a multi-resourc
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:32:56PM -0400, Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
>
> > > The subordinate transactions (on server2 and server3) call commit() on
> > > their datasources and return their votes to the main coordinator. The
> > > coordinator based on the votes takes a heuristic decision on what to d
> > The subordinate transactions (on server2 and server3) call commit() on
> > their datasources and return their votes to the main coordinator. The
> > coordinator based on the votes takes a heuristic decision on what to do
> > about the completion of this transaction. If there were no errors
>
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:16:12PM -0400, Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2001, Toby Allsopp wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 07:19:26PM -0400, Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
> > >
> > > I am running into problems with JBoss pools and Tyrex. This time it is a
> > > 2pc hueristic commit iss
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Toby Allsopp wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 07:19:26PM -0400, Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
> >
> > Hello everybody
>
> Hello. I guess I should attempt to field this.
>
> > I am running into problems with JBoss pools and Tyrex. This time it is a
> > 2pc hueristic commit issue
Hi,
As far as I can tell it is available only in print:
Distributed TP: The XA Specification
Paperback - 90 pages 0 edition (February 1, 1992)
The Open Group; ISBN: 1872630243
Available from amazon.com for US$59.95, 4-6 weeks wait.
A lot of money for 90 pages.
david jencks
opengroup.org - looks to be $35 USD.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Christian Riege [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss pool (former Minerva) transaction bug?
hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:05:10PM
hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:05:10PM +1200, Toby Allsopp wrote:
> The JTA spec is all I have to go on. It refers to the X/Open XA
> spec, but that's not free.
Free as in "free beer" or "free speech"? If it's "free beer" I would
be willing to donate the spec to the JBoss project (well, depend
Hi,
> > Tyrex upon getting successful commits from the XAResources, being in 2pc
> > sets heuristic to COMMIT and asks the XAResources to forget() the
> > transaction.
>
> I don't understand what JTA is talking about with "heuristic" this and
> that. It seems like a mechanism for dealing with st
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 07:19:26PM -0400, Anatoly Akkerman wrote:
>
> Hello everybody
Hello. I guess I should attempt to field this.
> I am running into problems with JBoss pools and Tyrex. This time it is a
> 2pc hueristic commit issue.
Great. A wurble-munging wickety booger.
> When Tyrex
Hello everybody
I am running into problems with JBoss pools and Tyrex. This time it is a
2pc hueristic commit issue.
When Tyrex commits a distributed transaction in 2pc, it asks all the
subordinate transactions to commit which ask their local XAResources to
commit.
Minerva on a commit call dis
12 matches
Mail list logo
