Good job!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Andreas Schaefer
> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 10:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMS 1.1
>
>
> Hi Geeks
>
> JMS 1.1 i
Hi,
when I modified our companies JMS Provider to be JMS 1.1 compliant
I had some problems with the new interfaces, because my implementations
implemented too much of them.
E.g. StdServerSessionPool and ConnectionFactoryHelper have some lines
in them, where they check
... if blaBla instanceof To
Hi Geeks
JMS 1.1 is in (it compiles and most test runs trough except one).
I will remove some redundant classes next week to make the
implementation clearer and then adjust the JUnit tests to cover
JMS 1.1.
Please note that this step only covers the necessary steps to
implement the common interf
