Excellent, that was the sort of reply I was hoping for.
thanks again,
dim
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The problem is that JMS has no real notion of security. You can provide
> a username and password when obtaining a connection but this is
> the extent of JMS security. There i
On 18 Okt, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The problem is that JMS has no real notion of security. You can provide
> a username and password when obtaining a connection but this is
> the extent of JMS security. There is no defined mechanism for propagating
> the user identity as part of the message.
>
> I
The problem is that JMS has no real notion of security. You can provide
a username and password when obtaining a connection but this is
the extent of JMS security. There is no defined mechanism for propagating
the user identity as part of the message.
I think its rather poor myself. I would be in
