Yes I agree it should be configurable. Regards, Hiram
>From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [jboss-group] Fw: [JBoss-user] Does JBoss3 have Problems >Deploying Similar ejb-jars in Different EARs >Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 00:40:00 -0500 > >Then you loose optimized calls between two deployments if they contain >copies of the same classes. > >We could offer an option like we do with wars, where it could (if the user >chooses) return to the default ejb behavior. > >-dain > >Hiram Chirino wrote: > >>Marc, >> >>I've got to side with scott here. Maybe I'm being academic but you seem >>to loose the class isolation benefits just to make it easier get >>classpaths right. >> >>How hard would it be to do something like: You create a UCL Repository >>for each Deployment Unit. Make every deployment unit have an identifier. >>When a deployment unit B depends on the classes of deployment unit A, he >>just specifies that he needs to import the classes of the deployment unit >>A. Then a cross UCL Repository association would be setup so that the >>Repository of B would use Repository A to load classes also. >> >>For bonus you might even allow configuring a UCL Repository to not allow >>some classes to be exported to other UCL Repositories.. >> >>So, what do you think, have I been smoking too long tonight?? >> >>Regards, >>HIram >> >>>From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "JBoss Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: Re: [jboss-group] Fw: [JBoss-user] Does JBoss3 have Problems >>>Deploying Similar ejb-jars in Different EARs >>>Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 19:11:29 -0700 >>> >>>That's absurd. So he also has to setup a port redirector to map from the >>>well know ports such as 1099, 80 onto the individual JBoss instances. >>>This >>>in general is not possible if each client does not have a unique virtual >>>host. >>>We need more flexibility in defining repository domains. >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "JBoss Group" >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:56 PM >>>Subject: RE: [jboss-group] Fw: [JBoss-user] Does JBoss3 have Problems >>>Deploying Similar ejb-jars in Different EARs >>> >>> >>> > | >>> > |So what does an ISP with 100 independent client ears who may very >>>well >>>all >>> > |be >>> > |using the same package names do? Setup 100 instances of JBoss with >>> > |each running seperate ports... >>> > >>> > yup >>> > >>> > marcf >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > jboss-group mailing list >>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > https://secure.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group >>> > >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>jboss-group mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>https://secure.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group >> >> >> >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com >> >>_______________________________________________ >>jboss-group mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://secure.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-group _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
