Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: FW: fix to org.jboss.management.mejb.ManagementBean

2004-01-15 Thread Charlton Barreto
Hi Adrian, I've posted my fix/reimplementation to ManagementBean and affected classes. Thanks for your time and help in this process. Best, -Charlton. On Jan 14, 2004, at 12:03, Charlton Barreto wrote: Hi Adrian, On Jan 14, 2004, at 11:42, Adrian Brock wrote: Hi Charlton, In anycase the

[JBoss-dev] Re: FW: fix to org.jboss.management.mejb.ManagementBean

2004-01-14 Thread Adrian Brock
Charlton, It looks like your patch (for head?) is exactly the same as the class in 3.2 with the javadocs removed and the whitespace corrupted. Is that correct? If not, post a patch/bug at www.sf.net/projects/jboss Regards, Adrian On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:42, Marc Fleury wrote:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: FW: fix to org.jboss.management.mejb.ManagementBean

2004-01-14 Thread Charlton Barreto
Hi Adrian, this isn't correct - i will analyze this and post to www.sf.net/projects/jboss -Charlton. On Jan 14, 2004, at 09:14, Adrian Brock wrote: Charlton, It looks like your patch (for head?) is exactly the same as the class in 3.2 with the javadocs removed and the whitespace

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: FW: fix to org.jboss.management.mejb.ManagementBean

2004-01-14 Thread Adrian Brock
Hi Charlton, Please keep it on the public lists so that others who are interested can take part. It looks like an overrsight. In anycase the implementation should probably be using MBeanServerConnection rather than MBeanServer. Regards, Adrian On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 19:41, Charlton Barreto

Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: FW: fix to org.jboss.management.mejb.ManagementBean

2004-01-14 Thread Charlton Barreto
Hi Adrian, On Jan 14, 2004, at 11:42, Adrian Brock wrote: Hi Charlton, In anycase the implementation should probably be using MBeanServerConnection rather than MBeanServer. This makes sense to me. I can reimplement using MBeanServerConnection and test. Please let me know if there's any reason