RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Service Lifecyle confusions - potential fix

2004-03-10 Thread Sacha Labourey
: [JBoss-dev] RE: Service Lifecyle confusions - potential fix I often see people puzzled by the fact that the depend tag does not include registration. When there are two SARs, the second of which has MBeans that depend on classes in the first one, the microkernel troughs Class Not Found

[JBoss-dev] Re: Service Lifecyle confusions - potential fix

2004-03-07 Thread Adrian Brock
I added your comment to the forums. http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3824602#3824602 It seems jboss-dev does not accept posts with jboss-dev in copy? Regards, Adrian On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 15:53, Bill Burke wrote: I was also hoping that you could supply a mixin class that

[JBoss-dev] RE: Service Lifecyle confusions - potential fix

2004-03-06 Thread Scott M Stark
The state machine was not immeadiately for the service layer, but will be used to enforce illegal transitions if we decide on a state diagram. The suggested change makes sense, but the other problem is the fact that the deployment layer is out of the loop in this. I would like to couple

[JBoss-dev] RE: Service Lifecyle confusions - potential fix

2004-03-06 Thread Adrian Brock
On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 02:08, Scott M Stark wrote: The state machine was not immeadiately for the service layer, but will be used to enforce illegal transitions if we decide on a state diagram. The suggested change makes sense, but the other problem is the fact that the deployment layer is