Updating XDoclet and there are a couple of small backwards compatibility
issues:
JBoss 3.0:
- any order
- at least one
JBoss 3.2:
- session beans, then entity beans, then message-driven beans
- none required
3.2 will break if beans interspersed or listed out of this order. Can we go
back to
ay, March 18, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_0.dtd vs jboss_3_2.dtd
> Updating XDoclet and there are a couple of small backwards compatibility
> issues:
>
> JBoss 3.0:
>
>
> - any order
> - at least one
>
> JBoss 3.2:
>
>
> - session
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_0.dtd vs jboss_3_2.dtd
>
> ...
> the enterprise-beans element model would have to be:
>
> content model for backward compability and consistency with the
Fine.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 6:29 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_0.dtd vs jboss_3_2.dt
