[JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-26 Thread Bill Burke
Code is under jboss-head/aop It compiles but that's about it. Its incomplete. The new direction is shown in the below xml if you can follow along. Don't have much time for explanation before Thanksgiving, but the idea is POJOs and DynamicProxies married into one framework. Field access, Constr

RE: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-26 Thread Hiram Chirino
PM To: Jboss-Dev Cc: Bob Lee; Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org Subject: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP Code is under jboss-head/aop It compiles but that's about it. Its incomplete. The new direction is shown in the below xml if you can follow along. Don't have much time for exp

RE: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-27 Thread marc fleury
002 10:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Bob Lee; Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP > > > wow... This will take AOP to the next level (interceptors on > fields and and constructors? WOW.). I'll checkout your stuff tonigh

Re: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-27 Thread David Jencks
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > > Behalf Of Hiram Chirino > > Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2002 10:59 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: Bob Lee; Jboss-Group@Jboss. Org > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP > >

RE: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-27 Thread marc fleury
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of David Jencks > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP > > > This looks similar in

Re: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-27 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
marc fleury wrote: I just saw this QDox http://qdox.sourceforge.net/index.html It could really help us to read the data from the source files. It seems that there is even a small AOP framework built on it (Nanning). Guys it is time to really commoditize this. The funny thing is that we don't

RE: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-27 Thread marc fleury
essage- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Anatoly Akkerman > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP > > > marc fleury wrote: > > I just

Re: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-29 Thread Stefan Arentz
On Wednesday, Nov 27, 2002, at 17:20 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury wrote: I just saw this QDox http://qdox.sourceforge.net/index.html It could really help us to read the data from the source files. It seems that there is even a small AOP framework built on it (Nanning). Guys it is time to r

RE: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-29 Thread marc fleury
> > THIS IS IT. WE ARE DONE. JB5 will be services coupled with > > interceptors in one easy to use and assemble framework. > > Marc, I've been reading about AOP, but I do not yet see the link with > JBoss yet. It would be great if you could explain in a few sentences > what advantage AOP has

Re: [JBoss-dev] new direction for JBoss AOP

2002-11-29 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
> On Wednesday, Nov 27, 2002, at 17:20 Europe/Amsterdam, marc fleury > wrote: > > > I just saw this QDox > > > > http://qdox.sourceforge.net/index.html > > > > It could really help us to read the data from the source files. It > > seems > > that there is even a small AOP framework built on it (Nann