[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Francisco Reverbel
Cc: Jason Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] org.jboss.proxy.compiler.Proxy + Serializable +
Replacable
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jason Dillo
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>
>>Any reason why Proxy.newProxyInstance() adds Serializable & Replacable
>>to proxy instances? I am guessing there is a reason, but it is not
>>documented anywhere.
>>
>
> This proxy compiler is (was?) used to generate
Yes, it appears that there is/was lots of legacy fluff in the proxy
generation system which it not used any more with the changed to BCEL.
I have cleaned up these classes, added some documenation and am adding
testcasess now.
I am going to leave it with Serializable, sounds like a reasonable
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Any reason why Proxy.newProxyInstance() adds Serializable & Replacable
> to proxy instances? I am guessing there is a reason, but it is not
> documented anywhere.
This proxy compiler is (was?) used to generate jdk 1.2 proxies.
These are (were?) sent o
Ok, well looks like Replacable isn't being used by anything. I found two references
to it, one in Proxy.java and one Replacable.java.
Serializable I can understand... though Replaceable extends Serializable, so it was
redundant to add the two interfaces.
--jason
__
Any reason why Proxy.newProxyInstance() adds Serializable & Replacable
to proxy instances? I am guessing there is a reason, but it is not
documented anywhere.
--jason
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
