stopherson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] xml config for Log4j
> With config files changing names, we should probably fork the docs (2.4
> fork and 3.0 docage on the main) soon.
&
With config files changing names, we should probably fork the docs (2.4
fork and 3.0 docage on the main) soon.
-danch
marc fleury wrote:
> Now that I (almost) done with the container synchronization rewrite, I am
> going to commit the JBoss 3.0 code that I have on my laptop, if I remember
> co
Last I checked the xml config did not support custom priorities which is why
I'm not using it.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 1:15 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] xml config for Lo
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 4:16 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] xml config for Log4j
|
|
|How about using the xml configuration file for Log4j as the
|default? At
How about using the xml configuration file for Log4j as the default? At the
very, very least it is nicer to look at in Emacs with font-lock, at best it
makes more of the JBoss config xml... wow. =]
I was also hoping to change the default JBoss category format to something
like this:
%c{1} [%t]