aeh ... look into org.jboss.deployment.scope.* (and please use version 1.7
for J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer ;-). See also
my concurrent email about a kind of abstract deployment framework that could
be
seated on top of JMX, EJB, WAR, RAR, etc.

Main idea is that we introduce a subclass of URLCLassLoader that delegates
non-satisifiable
resource loading calls (loadClass, getResource) to a representation called
"scope". The scope then incrementally searches the desired resource in all
other classloaders registered in that scope, caches the resource locations
and keeps track of the dependencies that result from doing so. The deployer
interoperates with the scope in order to safely (and in order)
startup/teardown applications.

Is there a way to persuade JMX to use a particular classloader for starting
a service? If your aim is to exchange the byte-code of MLets at runtime,
then this really might be the way to go ...

Best,
CGJ

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Juni 2001 17:35
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java


hey doctor,

thinking some more this morning, shoving some coffee in my face.

I believe the MLet stuff in JBoss is broken.  It disables redeploy of
services, it is a deploy once framework right now, albeit I can make it a
dynamic one at least (meaning deploy anytime).

I will try to include our stuff as parent of the mlet... that is the way
imho.  Can you send me (or us) again a status of what you did listing the
classes? I know what we are trying to do, no need to explain that part, I
need to know what classes and where.  Will try to go back to that this week.

over and out...

marcf

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung
|, Dr. Christoph
|Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 8:10 AM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java
|
|
|Andy,
|
|this single file was my whole pride, my sense of life, my only love.
|
|Would you pleeeeeaaaaaaaaaase bring it back (1.7 seems ok, but I do not
|exactly know
|the mgt->management changes you did in the meantime) ?
|
|Thx,
|CGJ
|
|>   User: schaefera
|>   Date: 01/06/15 22:53:38
|>
|>   Modified:    src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope
|>                         J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java
|>   Log:
|>   Added the support for classes with a single string as only argument for
|>   the constructor to the ConfigurationService. Some fixes and additional
|>   methods for the JBoss management.
|>
|>   Revision  Changes    Path
|>   1.8       +0 -497
|jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/scope/J2eeGlobalScopeDeployer.java
|
|_______________________________________________
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to