AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration

2002-04-03 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:20 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration > > Hi Adrian, > > Just a quick feedback. Compilation is ok, most stuff runs fine and > faster > ;-) > > From what I

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration

2002-04-02 Thread Peter Braswell
Christoph et.al. This is what I fixed last night. The MBeanInvocationHandler now "snoops" for method names beginning w/"get" or "set" and redirects the invoke() to get/set attribute where appropriate. I'll send you the code and UnitTests tonight. cheers, pjb --- Adrian Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration

2002-04-02 Thread Adrian Brock
Hi CGJ, I think your problem is attributes. JBossMX doesn't support invocations like server.invoke(myObjectName, "getAttribute", new Object[0], new String[0]); You should use server.getAttribute("Attribute") instead. The RI for jmx1.0 allows the invoke, but it will be gone with jmx1.1. It was

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net/IIOP and JBossMX integration

2002-04-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Adrian, Just a quick feedback. Compilation is ok, most stuff runs fine and faster ;-) >From what I saw, the reflection of the Mbean interfaces in jboss-jmx seems to differ from jmxri.jar ... Because I use to define first client-side (non-Mbean) interfaces from which the Mbean interfaces ar