Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment Dependencies (was RE: [JBoss-dev]RHstartupandJBossMQ)

2001-09-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
>>> I read the FAQ ++ - and was impressed by the "copy" - but - since I was then >>> looking at a way to have "self-discovery" over geo spatial boundaries, I >>> ditched JINI ... becouse of its bradcast nature ... >> If you want Jini discovery over large distances (=multiple subnets), >> simply u

[JBoss-dev] Re: Deployment Dependencies (was RE: [JBoss-dev]RHstartupandJBossMQ)

2001-09-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-09-07 12.31, Rickard Öberg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you want Jini discovery over large distances (=multiple subnets), > simply use a bridge. A dynamic bridge ??? /peter_f ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://list

Re: Deployment Dependencies (was RE: [JBoss-dev] RHstartupandJBossMQ)

2001-09-07 Thread Rickard Öberg
Peter Fagerlund wrote: > > Oh please. Jini is also open: you get the code, you can distribute your > > apps, you can distribute the Jini binary, etc. > > Then maybe We could buy a copy of JDMK and use SNMP ? ... JDMK also gives > You the code - you can distribute your apps - you can distribute th

Re: Deployment Dependencies (was RE: [JBoss-dev] RHstartupandJBossMQ)

2001-09-07 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 1-09-07 10.31, Rickard Öberg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Peter Fagerlund wrote: How does Jini make JBoss a better platform for writing applications? >>> >>> Because it makes servers aware of other servers more easily, and >>> services aware of other services more easily. >> >> JINI is