Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken?

2005-09-14 Thread acoliver
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:00 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken? That seems ill-advised. Dimitris Andreadis wrote: The har deployer is gone and the SAR deployer now handles .har too (in any case .har really

RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken?

2005-09-13 Thread Scott M Stark
t;>-Original Message- > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:14 AM > >>To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > >>Subject: Re: [

Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken?

2005-09-13 Thread acoliver
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:14 AM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken? You really think a whole lot of users build JBoss from source? Apparently I was following old instructions, the module name has changed to jboss-4.0.x. It is

RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken?

2005-09-13 Thread Scott M Stark
ber 13, 2005 2:14 PM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken? > > You really think a whole lot of users build JBoss from source? > > Apparently I was following old instructions, the module name > has changed to jboss-4.0.x. It

RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken?

2005-09-13 Thread Dimitris Andreadis
14, 2005 12:14 AM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 build broken? > > You really think a whole lot of users build JBoss from source? > > Apparently I was following old instructions, the module name > has changed to jboss-4.0.x. It