AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 2:41 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jaws.dtd
> I did the changes.
> So : jwas.dtd and jboss.dtd are frozen and should be change anymore.
> All changes are now made to
directly if needed]
Vincent.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Mike
> Swainston-Rainford
> Envoye : jeudi 21 juin 2001 1:33
> A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
> jboss/src/resource
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:36 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jaws.dtd
I'm not so sure. There are other changes to the 2.4 dtds that are not in
the ones I mailed in. In particular the se
for jaws xml files.
>Regards.
>Vincent.
>
> > -Message d'origine-
> > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> > Scott M Stark
> > Envoyé : jeudi 21 juin 2001 0:25
> > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : Re: [JBoss-de
I think the changes to both jaws and jboss should be merged into 2.4 but it
should be into the jboss_2_4 and jaws_2_4 files.
I think actually this is where the changes should have been made in the
first place (the _2_4 files) since Scott froze jboss.dtd and jaws.dtd for
the 2.2 release and cr
MAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
> jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jaws.dtd
>
>
> Does this change needs to be merged to the 2.4 branch as well?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Does this change needs to be merged to the 2.4 branch as well?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jaws.dtd
> User: vharcq
> Date: 01/
D]
> Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
> jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jaws.dtd jboss.dtd
>
>
> Vincent
>
> just been doing a few tests and there's a flaw in the latest jaws.dtd.
>
> I think the second line in the snippet below should be
>+
>
>
Vincent
just been doing a few tests and there's a flaw in the latest jaws.dtd.
I think the second line in the snippet below should be
+
Also wouldn't it be better singular - ie type-mapping-definition
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mike S-R
At 00:38 19/06/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> User: v
