Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ests on different OS'es
I agree. Without going overboard, it'd be great to set some specific milestones regarding the
quality of the code and documentation that need to be met for 3.0 final release (i.e. has to
pass the test suite with no errors,
nell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> |Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:53 AM
> |To: marc fleury; Chris Kimpton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ests on different OS'es
> |
> |
> |I looked at Tinderbox a while ago and decided I could
> |do better in Java.
&g
]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ests on different OS'es
|
|
|I looked at Tinderbox a while ago and decided I could
|do better in Java.
|
|I started cobbling together something with SOAP
|services and JBoss - J[ava] D[istributed] B[uild]
|S[ystem].
|
|Something like this.
|
|You tell a Slave where
I looked at Tinderbox a while ago and decided I could
do better in Java.
I started cobbling together something with SOAP
services and JBoss - J[ava] D[istributed] B[uild]
S[ystem].
Something like this.
You tell a Slave where it's master is.
The Slave starts up and registers it's availability
w
Sounds great actually, having the automated tests is an important thing for
the next fase of dev. In fact even just the compile farm with Linux but
triggered when there are tag updates would be an important thing for us not
to miss obvious problems in the tests.
marcf
|-Original Message
