RE: [JBoss-dev] Optimizing distributed transactions and introducing InvocationResult

2002-02-20 Thread marc fleury
yes there are a 1000 places that will benefit from client side interceptors and Invocation as return. Also some clustering/failover and batching of invocations (from Paul and Eric) consider it done marcf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PRO

RE: [JBoss-dev] Optimizing distributed transactions and introducing InvocationResult

2002-02-20 Thread marc fleury
see my previous mail, this is a sub-set of the client side interceptor work I want to do marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung |, Dr. Christoph |Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 12:21 AM |To: 'Jboss-Development ([EMAIL PROTECTED])'

RE: [JBoss-dev] Optimizing distributed transactions and introducing InvocationResult

2002-02-20 Thread marc fleury
|This raises an issue of adding payload not only to the Invocation itself |but to the return from Invocation. Say we can introduce InvocationResult |which can contain arbitrary payload along with the actual result of the |invocation or exceptions that occured during invocation. Stripping the |payl

RE: [JBoss-dev] Optimizing distributed transactions and introducing InvocationResult

2002-02-18 Thread Bill Burke
Dr. In clustering, I also have a need to piggyback information with the invocation result. InvocationResult sounds like a good thing. My memory is failing, but I think CORBA does the same. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung > ,

Re: [JBoss-dev] Optimizing distributed transactions and introducing InvocationResult

2002-02-17 Thread Ole Husgaard
Hi, (I currently have very little time, so here are just a few thoughts. I may not have time to enter a discussion about this.) But what if something bad happens? In your scenario, assume that Bean B updates a resource in the context of transaction T'. This means that transactional locks are h