Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-30 Thread Luke Taylor
marc fleury wrote: > Bill got my hear yesterday (and today is talking to microsoft about > his love for open source :) where he pitched the interceptor design > on the 3.0 client side. > > Instant love. > Sounds pretty interesting (the interceptor design that is :). I'm vaguely familiar w

Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread Holger Engels
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, marc fleury wrote: > Bill got my hear yesterday where he pitched the interceptor design on the 3.0 client >side. > Instant love. > > We are not that far from it in fact, it a bit of renaming and factory game on the >server. Essentially the client does > > Generic Proxy

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread marc fleury
|OK. So that's the current state? What's the Handler in this context - is |that the JRMPInvokerProxy, for example? no we are talking about 3.0 the "handler" is one of the proxy classes with EJB behavior but disconnected from the transport (JRMP-Proxy was 2.0). The current state is that this has

Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread Luke Taylor
olger Engels wrote: > > I'm glad to see, that jboss will support pluggable interceptors on the > client side, now. You can do cool things with that. Think of: > > ... > > o caching interceptor (for getters) How will that work in practice? Aren't the interceptors stateless, without being

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread Bill Burke
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Luke > Taylor > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors > > > olger Engels wrote: &

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread Holger Engels
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Bill Burke wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Luke > > Taylor > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:32 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject

Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread Luke Taylor
Holger Engels wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Bill Burke wrote: > >>> >>> >>You're right here. EJBs have no asynchronous interface like CORBA object do. Arrgh! You mean the dreaded "oneway" keyword? I'd forgotten all about that. >>Plus, in EJB the request is not exposed like in CORBA as well.

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread marc fleury
|only the last one is directly implemented by the dynamic proxy. security |and transactions are somewhat transcendent/magic. A drawback of multiple |interfaces is that you have to cast the object to these particular |interfaces in order to use them. These apis are not exposed in the dynamic proxy

RE: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors

2002-01-31 Thread marc fleury
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Luke |Taylor |Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:56 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors | | |Holger Engels wrote: | |> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Bill Burke wrote: |> |>>> |>>> |>>You're ri