Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
Thats not non-repudiation (or at least my understanding of it).
Non-repudiation also provides for company B knowing that company A received
it so that if company B doesn't fill the PO company A can say I know you
received it.
Yes.
I suggest any interested in
15, 2002 1:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net email transport
So send a signed HTTP post over SSL. A digital sig is a digital sig
whether by email or post. The only advantange email has is that the
clients are better setup to manage the keys and perform the signing
- Original Message -
From: Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net email transport
So, here is where I am with this currently (not commited yet).
jboss.net can receive a signed message
Thanks Scott
I'm not sure I completely understand how all the parts in JBossSX
interact yet (I'm RE-reading the chapter in the Admin-devel guide
AGAIN, only slower and annunciating every syllable this time :-), but
in the mean time I'll begin writing the login module.
So should the
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net email transport
So should the JaasSecurityDomain domain= be the same name as as my
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Jason Essington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net email transport
Thanks Scott
I'm not sure I
AAAH! the pieces are beginning to fall into place
Thanks
-jason
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 12:12 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
Yes, the domain property of the JaasSecurityDomain JMX ObjectName is
the
name of the security domain that correlates with the JAAS login module
configuration
and
Hi Matt,
Given an instance where a company would place a server on its intranet
(behind a firewall that does not allow incoming connections from the
internet).
Now, If this company wanted to receive periodic updates to some
semi-static data (iso country codes for instance) from a source on
that? Wasn't this same argument used for HTTP tunnelling?
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Jason
Essington
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 08:55 AM, Matt Munz wrote:
Jason,
Well, you've peaked my interest...
This method(with digital signatures/encryption) would be more secure
than the Http(s) transport,
Really? Any articles on the subject?
Using digital signatures / xml encryption
12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net email transport
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 08:55 AM, Matt Munz wrote:
Jason,
Well, you've peaked my interest...
This method(with digital signatures/encryption) would be more secure
than the Http(s) transport
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net email transport
Hi Matt,
Given an instance where a company would place a server on its intranet
(behind a firewall that does not allow incoming connections from the
internet).
Now, If this company wanted to receive periodic updates to some
semi
]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net email transport
Jason,
Well, you've peaked my interest...
This method(with digital signatures/encryption) would be more secure
than the Http(s) transport,
Really? Any articles on the subject?
Authentication would be near definite
(rather
13 matches
Mail list logo
