Re: [JBoss-dev] Maybe NonserializableFactory could be in a better package...

2002-11-23 Thread David Jencks
i'm moving them to org.jboss.util.naming to match all the other naming related package names. It will probably take a day or two to get into cvs since this is wrapped up with the tm logging implementation. david jencks On 2002.11.23 22:30:46 -0500 Scott M Stark wrote: > These are common JNDI uti

Re: [JBoss-dev] Maybe NonserializableFactory could be in a better package...

2002-11-23 Thread Scott M Stark
These are common JNDI utility stuff that does not depend on the JNDI implementation details so it should be in common, say in a org.jboss.util.jndi package. The org.jboss.naming package in server exists because the jnp implementation of JNDI existed standalone prior to jboss. In 4.0 this will move