Thank you, that is MUCH better... he he I always knew the JMX RI logger was
sheit...
ok it means 2 things,
1- we rewrite the JMX impl in house
2- we put in the SpyderMQ version or equivalent async
marc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behal
Rickard,
I just used the filter to reduce logging, which is why I didn't see a huge change in
performace. After last nights tests I was very impressed however. Results posted
soon.
brandon
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/30/00 12:08AM >>>
Hi!
Brandon Campbell wrote:
> On previous tests I had red
Hi!
Brandon Campbell wrote:
> On previous tests I had reduced the loggin from logging Debug, Infomation, Warning,
>Error to just Error with simingly very little effect on times (I didn't record the
>times so I could be mistaken). These test were done with Information, Warning and
>Error.
Did
JDBCCommand.java to false
>
>marc
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brandon Campbell
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 7:53 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User]
rc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brandon Campbell
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 9:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
>
>
> On previous tests I had reduce
t 29, 2000 9:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
>
>
> On previous tests I had reduced the loggin from logging Debug,
> Infomation, Warning, Error to just Error with simingly very
> little effect on times (I didn't record the ti
Dan.
I don't think so, I havn't explored using Minerva yet, So it it doesn't default to it
then I didn't use it.
Brandon
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/29/00 10:11AM >>>
Brandon,
Were you using Minerva?
-Dan
Brandon Campbell wrote:
> Here's some performance numbers that I got last night.
>
> I'
t: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 7:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
>
>
> Here's some performance numbers that I got last night.
>
> I'm using a CVS version from Friday afternoon, Dual Celeron
> 400mhz, 384 meg RAM, MS SQL 7
CTED]
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
>
>
> Here's some performance numbers that I got last night.
>
> I'm using a CVS version from Friday afternoon, Dual Celeron
> 400mhz, 384 meg RAM, MS SQL 7.0, JDBC-ODBC bridge. The client,
> jBoss and
Brandon,
Were you using Minerva?
-Dan
Brandon Campbell wrote:
Here's some performance numbers that I got last night.
I'm using a CVS version from Friday afternoon, Dual Celeron 400mhz,
384 meg RAM, MS SQL 7.0, JDBC-ODBC bridge. The client, jBoss and
MSSQL are all running on the same machine. I
Here's some performance numbers that I got last night.
I'm using a CVS version from Friday afternoon, Dual Celeron 400mhz, 384 meg RAM, MS
SQL 7.0, JDBC-ODBC bridge. The client, jBoss and MSSQL are all running on the same
machine. I am create a combination of four CMP entity beans.
1. 28
Unable to find benchmarking information. All it tells me is that it finished
86 tests. Doesn't mention anything about invocations.
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 7:14 PM
To: jBoss
Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] JBoss perform
MAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Jenks
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 12:50 PM
> To: jBoss
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
>
>
> At 12:41 PM 8/27/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >I would love to see numbers on both!
> >yeah, a PC and a E4500 neck to neck.
>
At 12:41 PM 8/27/00 -0700, you wrote:
>I would love to see numbers on both!
>yeah, a PC and a E4500 neck to neck.
>
>Sun isn't what it used to :(
>
>well actually let's see those numbers :)
Exactly what numbers would those be? Is there a benchmark client/server
somewhere?
-- Ken Jenks, http://
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Jenks
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 4:28 AM
> To: jBoss
> Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
>
>
> At 10:28 AM 8/26/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >I don't know what kind of hardware you guys
t: Re: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
At 10:28 AM 8/26/00 -0700, you wrote:
>I don't know what kind of hardware you guys are testing this one, but when
>you release thw final version of 2.0, I have a Sun Enterprise 4500 I could
>stress test it on?
I have the other end -- I'm ru
At 10:28 AM 8/26/00 -0700, you wrote:
>I don't know what kind of hardware you guys are testing this one, but when
>you release thw final version of 2.0, I have a Sun Enterprise 4500 I could
>stress test it on?
I have the other end -- I'm running jBoss on a 100 MHz Pentium.
(Someone should be rec
turday, August 26, 2000 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
>Rob Castaneda wrote:
>> Inprise had some example test code that they used to compare against
other
>> servers. Full documentation and code available at: (Actually the
>> documentation was removed
Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One thread is ok, but it fails with many threads. I'm guessing a problem
>in JAWS.
Keep me informed (the thread safety changes we discussed yesterday are
all in CVS).
--
Justin Forder
--
--
Rickard Öberg wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> Rob Castaneda wrote:
> > Inprise had some example test code that they used to compare against other
> > servers. Full documentation and code available at: (Actually the
> > documentation was removed due to legal threats from a competitor that they
> > had compare
Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] JBoss performances
Hey
Rob Castaneda wrote:
> Inprise had some example test code that they used to compare against other
> servers. Full documentation and code available at: (Actually the
> documentation was removed due to legal threats from a competitor that t
Rob Castaneda wrote:
> Inprise had some example test code that they used to compare against other
> servers. Full documentation and code available at: (Actually the
> documentation was removed due to legal threats from a competitor that they
> had compared their server to)
>
> http://www.inprise.
Hey
Rob Castaneda wrote:
> Inprise had some example test code that they used to compare against other
> servers. Full documentation and code available at: (Actually the
> documentation was removed due to legal threats from a competitor that they
> had compared their server to)
>
> http://www.inp
Inprise had some example test code that they used to compare against other
servers. Full documentation and code available at: (Actually the
documentation was removed due to legal threats from a competitor that they
had compared their server to)
http://www.inprise.com/devsupport/appserver/faq/
un
At 14:50 24.8.2000 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello all,
>I am conducting a survey of application servers. I haven't found any
>performance data about JBoss. Are there any existing benchmarks out there,
>websites or other?
Not yet, as jBoss is still in beta stage (til 1st of September). There will
be som
25 matches
Mail list logo
