[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Possible bug in fork-joins

2006-09-07 Thread JerWah
Glad I could help. We too are very new to bpm. As for the persistence, in our situation we have a very slow process (Months) which is externally moved forward via a custom webapp, so obviously we need to persist the token counter. It seemed most logical to us to persist it in the join at

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Possible bug in fork-joins

2006-09-06 Thread JerWah
I recently battled this very issue. Attached is the code for a custom join node that seems to work in all scenarios. (I edited out some of our specific code so as posted may not exactly work but you should get the gist.) | | public class join implements ActionHandler | { |

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Easy One : Creating Testcase Swimlane Assignments

2006-08-23 Thread JerWah
Answers: Version: bpm 3.1.2 This is the testcase I am trying to run: | public void testProcess() throws Exception { | | // Extract a process definition from the processdefinition.xml file. | FileInputStream fis = new