Hi
I have a process definition as shown in the link below.
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/4963a9f1b7.jpg
When I run it with all nodes set to async and all joins with lock=UPGRADE
and with multiple or single job executors I get a nullpointer exception. It
fails wwhen exectuting the
And
A, B, C, D, G
all execute ok.
The rest do not execute at all and the exception is thrrown at F.
Also, all actions are async.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4197337#4197337
Reply to the post :
The action class for F was missing. I added it using the Eclipse edditor but
that failed to tranfer that to the xml. Stupid me was relying on the gui. I now
know to always double check the xml file.
Thanks
PS. The nullpointer and debugging did not make it easy to identif what was
missing but
kukeltje wrote : Btw, your processdefinition is illegal... not all legs of
the fork arrive in the same corresponding join. There should be an additional
fork after the fork but before B and C)and an additional join after F and G but
before the join You cannot partially nest things
Yes,
We are having the same problem. Has anyone tried other options like
optimistic-lock=false
on some of the relationships between token and the other tables? The children
relationship looks suspect in that is a child Token gets removed or added, the
version of the parent Token is incremented.
Hi
Why does the hibernate only use the single oracle database sequence? We tend to
use a separate sequence for every table unless we need to have uniqueness
across multiple tables.
Does jBPM use the sequence value in any way? We had the same problem when we
used OS Workflow in that the whole
Thanks jbarrez. I am aware I can change it but the question is
will changing the model to use multiple sequences have any adverse affects in
jBPM
I don't want to get any unexpected behavior like I did with OSWorkflow
View the original post :
