Hi all,
Although the lock="UPGRADE" without the session.flush() solves the problem
in 3.3.0.GA, the same solution in version 3.2.3 does not work.
For our company this is not a problem, we can switch to 3.3.0.GA easily since
we do not run production right now.
I thought this was valuable
The problem is fixed!
It was caused by an programming error and had nothing to do with the JBPM
framework. My humble appologies to the people who spend time on this.
We are new to JBPM so we make some mistakes now and then :-))
Jan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
Ronald,
i've send you an email using ron...@jbpm.org. Do you still use that email
address??
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197520#4197520
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4197520
___
To All,
Specifying the lock="UPGRADE" on the join node does the trick!!
Even without the call to session.flush() in the join class.
I want to thank all of you for your great support!!!
Hopefully the fix for this bug can be included in the next release.
Thanks again!
Jan
View the origin
Martin,
can we set the lock attribute in the processdefinition.xml?? Not according to
the documentation imho.
Jan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197124#4197124
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
Ai Martin shame on me!!!
We have 2 hibernate.cfg.xml deployed in the jboss server: 1 that comes with
the JBPM installation and 1 that was generated by SEAM for our application.
Since JBPM did create-drop the jbpm tables and that behaviour was NOT specified
in the JBPM hibernate.cfg.xml
Hello,
We are running seam/jbpm on oracle. The jbpm version is 3.3.0 GA
We ran into several problems that we did not experience when running the stuff
on HSQLB.
One of the problems (and this is probably also the cause for other oracle
related problems) is that oracle does not have auti-id f
Hello,
We are running seam/jbpm on oracle. The jbpm version is 3.3.0 GA
We ran into several problems that we did not experience when running the stuff
on HSQLB.
One of the problems (and this is probably also the cause for other oracle
related problems) is that oracle does not have auti-id f
Hello,
we're using seam / jbpm running on a oracle 10g database. Among some other
problems (see ohter threads) we cannot hot deploy a process from the jpdl
designer eclipse plugin. (This hot deployment does work OK when jbpm is running
on HSQLDB)
I suspect it is related to the problem that
Ronald,
I will post some new treads about the other oracle related problems soon.
But the main issue there is (as far as I can see) that the oracle
implementation does not auto increment the id fields. Apart from creating a
hibernate-sequence, the jbpm (or hibernate) does not seem to use tha
Ronald,
Excuse me, you are right about the code snippet. I pasted the the wrong code
in here. This is the correct code:
| if ( parentToken != null ) {
|
| JbpmContext jbpmContext = executionContext.getJbpmContext();
| Session session = (jbpmContext!=null ? jbp
Ronald,
the code snippet came from the source code that was shipped with the 3.3.0
GA release download. I assumed that this is 3.3.0. code!!!
Martin,
your stripped version exposes the problem correctly I think although such a
situation is hypothetical. But I think a fork that transitio
The version 3.2.3 has the same (faulty) result. We switched to 3.3.0 in the
hope that this problem was fixed in that version. :-((
Jan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196594#4196594
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?modul
Ronald,
Wat let je? Leuke tent, goede voorwaardes, uitdagende projecten. Goede
mensen altijd welkom.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196592#4196592
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=
The lockMode = "FORCE". This is what the debugger says.
I don't know where to look for in the database for the lock mode in the join
table???
the parentToken that will be locked has a node attribute that called Fork !!
The token that is referred to in the exception has a node reference to the
Fo
Martin,
The token for which the update fails belongs to the fork and not the join
according to the database. Mayby this will help you solving the problem.
Jan[/img]
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196561#4196561
Reply to the post :
http://
Martin, Just posted the test result before your last response
Jan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196560#4196560
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4196560
___
The session.flush() does not seem to make any difference!
Changed the code in class Join as follows:
109 if (session!=null) {
| 110 LockMode lockMode = LockMode.FORCE;
| 111 if (parentLockMode!=null) {
| 112 lockMode = LockMode.parse(parentLockMode);
|
Yes, I will do that and let you know about the result.
Thanks for your quick response guys!
Jan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196537#4196537
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4196537
forget my previous response, wrong thread!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196535#4196535
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4196535
___
jboss-user m
Martin,
It certainly looks like a deja vu! In the current code of 3.3.0. ther is
no flush before the session.lock method.
Was the calling the flush before taking the lock the solution to the problem??
If so, will this be fixed soon??
Jan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/in
Martin,
I think it looks like the same problem, will ther be a fix for this soon??
Jan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4196529#4196529
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4196529
_
Ronald,
We use transaction level Read-committed as adviced in the documentation.
| JbpmDS
|
TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED
|
| We also tried an XA datasource but that gave the same result.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=view
Hello,
I'm using jbpm 3.3.0. and we noticed a problem with the following process
construction:
a fork that splits into 3 decision nodes, these decision nodes transition to
either a task node or directly toi the join.
Transitions from the decision to the task node are OK, transitions from th
Hello.
We have installed JBPM 3.3.0 for evaluation purposes.
During testing we ran into some problems when using subprocesses.
According to the documentation, a variable defined in a subprocess should be
saved in the "main"process when the subprocess ended.
This does not seems to be the case i
They are missing in the 3.3.0 version.
I took them from the 3.2.3 version:
create table JBPM_ID_GROUP (ID_ number(19,0) not null, CLASS_ char(1 char) not
null, NAME_ varchar2(255 char), TYPE_ varchar2(255 char), PARENT_ number(19,0),
primary key (ID_));
create table JBPM_ID_MEMBERSHIP (ID_ numb
That great! But. I have some problems with running the console of 3.3.0
How do I provide the users and passwords ? In previous versions we added a
users.properties and roles.properties file to the consoles war classpath, but
this does not work in this version.
I could not find how to so
Since the jboss seam console (jbpm-enterprise.ear) does not contain a
hibernate.cfg.xml file, it is my assumption that seam/hibernate takes the
dialect from the in the jbpm-ds.xml which contains in my case :
Oracle9i
I can see in the log file that the oracle 10G dialect is used for datasource
Thanks for the hint. I'll check it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4186304#4186304
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4186304
___
jboss-user mailing
Hi,
I'm a newbie for JBPM so bear with me...
We had JBPM 3.2.3 running on JBOSS app server using Hypersonic as db.
We had cdeployed som processes, tested them with the jbpm-console and
everything seemed to work fine.
Then we replaced the hypersonic db by an Oracle 10g database.
When starting t
30 matches
Mail list logo
