estaub> Already using READ_COMMITTED, unfortunately no effect
jeffj55374> Thanks for the info, upgrading jBPM may not be an option, so we'll
have to resort to writing some custom locking code I guess...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131744#41
pojomonkey, thanks for the reply. However, I don't think it helped me. My
current code signal()s the tokens within the fork, and should thus be correct.
In fact, perhaps to clarify, when the signal()s are executed in sequence, no
exceptions occur.
Oh, and I'm using jBPM 3.1.4 btw
View the orig
Hi,
I'm working a jBPM implementation with the following characteristics:
1) All calls go to external systems, so we use states for modeling the
different steps.
2) We might be using forks in our processes, which thus contain states.
3) The external systems store their reply in a variable attach
That was what I meant (sorry for the bad explanation, looks confusing after
re-reading it)
So from the parent bean I outject a container (simple POJO) into the context
under a specified name and refer (inject) to this object from the child context.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.co
Hi Denis,
Thanks for your reply. The option to retrieve the data from the parent scope
was clear to me, however the question is how to add this object to the parent
scope? Outjection is probably an option, however: is there a risk of
naming-clashes between the different objects, is the code an
Hi all,
I've got a question about seam regarding the use of nested conversations and
more specifically, how I can pass data between nested conversations. To
explain, consider the following hypothetical use case of a banking application:
I have a generic "web-component" (i.e. set of classes, fac
