Great.
Much appreciated.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104743#4104743
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104743
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss
Our system may produce a large number of messages. What I'm concerned about is
that the data volume on a node would multiply depending on the number of peer
nodes pulling/pushing.
Most of the time there will be at least one consumer on each queue. So there is
no need to route/pull the messages
I see.
One question on fault-tolerange to message loss. Do the messages get replicated
across the cluster (using post-office pulling or post-office routing?), so in
case a node fails, they are not lost OR are they stored in a database until
acknowledged?
If it's the database, then I can assume
That explains it.
Thank you.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4104296#4104296
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4104296
___
jboss-user mailing list
jb
Hello
Could someone, please, explain what's the advantage of using HA-singleton vs
Distributed queue (DQ)?
Is HA-singleton simply the old way for providing the fail-over functionality,
and should not be used as DQ is better?
Is the difference only in JMS implementation (JBM vs JBossMQ)?
Can JBM
