[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Diff in behaviour with STATE_SAVING changed to server fr

2007-01-31 Thread kevin.genie
Hello: Since this thread is old, let me say the problem again. If the STATE_SAVING_METHOD is changed to server from client and when a page is taken from a link second time , the first conversation and bean is not getting destroyed. I have a test case to reproduce this behaviour using the

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Diff in behaviour with STATE_SAVING changed to server fr

2007-01-31 Thread kevin.genie
Hello Gavin, I don't get you, Gavin. I think you have not read the posting fully or my posting is not clear. What I tried to say was that there is a difference in behaviour in conversation start/end/propagation when the STATE_SAVING_METHOD is changed from client to server. When the

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Diff in behaviour with STATE_SAVING changed to server fr

2007-01-31 Thread kevin.genie
Hello Gavin, Sorry.. I didn't mentioned the MyFaces version. The NumberGuess 1.0.1 GA uses MyFaces 1.1.3 . I also tested with Seam 1.1 and MyFaces 1.1.4 and in both cases this behaviour exists. Thanx, Kevin. View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Diff in behaviour with STATE_SAVING changed to server fr

2007-01-31 Thread kevin.genie
Hello Gavin, Thanks for the instant replies and confirmation. I will post it to MyFaces forum and JIRA. Thanx, Kevin. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4009223#4009223 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Diff in behaviour with STATE_SAVING changed to server fr

2007-01-04 Thread kevin.genie
Hello: Shall i report this in JIRA ? I feel that this issue is important because the behaviour should be same irrespective of the STATE_SAVING_METHOD, right ? Thanx Kevin. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3998164#3998164 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Diff in behaviour with STATE_SAVING changed to server from c

2007-01-02 Thread kevin.genie
Hello: I have the navigation menu in my application as outputlinks to *.seam pages. When the page is taken thru the outputlinks, I begin the conversation by annotating the Factory method(s) in converstation scoped SFSB with @Begin(join=true). Now, if the STATE_SAVING is client, every

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Diff in behaviour with STATE_SAVING changed to server fr

2007-01-02 Thread kevin.genie
Hello: I forget to mention - the conversation is also same if you take the page again from the link in the case of STATE_SAVING = server. Thanx Kevin View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3997193#3997193 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Conversation timeout and pageflow

2006-12-19 Thread kevin.genie
Thanks for the reply, Gavin. Are you sure there are two conversations? Do you see two different conversation ids Yes, the converstation ids are different. If so, are you sure that one is not a nested conversation of the other. I have not used nested = true at the Begin annotation.

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Conversation timeout and pageflow

2006-12-18 Thread kevin.genie
Hello: I have a pageflow with Begin defined at the Create method of a SFSB. One of the pages in the pagefow has a pop up window which opens in new window to search and set a value in the parent window. Now this child window is not part of the page flow but the parent window is. Now, 1. The

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Audit Interceptor with State

2006-12-13 Thread kevin.genie
Thanks very much Gavin, for spending time in explaining that. For the auditing part, I am now trying to do it thru Hibernate SessionFactory level Interceptor. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3993389#3993389 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - EL enhancement failing if Scope is not Session

2006-12-13 Thread kevin.genie
Hello: The EL enhancement for passing parameters is not working for me if the scope of the component in which the Datamodel is declared is not Session. As in Booking example, I have a Search page with a datatable with value binding to a datamodel declared in SFSB with Session Scope. In the

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Audit Interceptor with State

2006-12-06 Thread kevin.genie
Thanks very much. I was on vacation. I am going to work on it today itself. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3991568#3991568 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3991568

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Audit Interceptor with State

2006-11-30 Thread kevin.genie
Hello, I was just reading through the EntityHome Manager pattern and it seems that for that to work I have to use SeamManagedPersistenceContext. In my application we are not using SeamManagerPersistenceContext and are relying on EJB container for Tx demarcation. In this case, what will be the

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Audit Interceptor with State

2006-11-29 Thread kevin.genie
Hi, What will be the best way to implement a Audit Log feature with Seam + EJB3 entity beans? I have read thru several docs but was unable to find a way to pass state to the interceptor. By state what i mean is some data that is specific to the context. (For ex, the currently logged in

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Audit Interceptor with State

2006-11-29 Thread kevin.genie
Hello, Can u pls post ur code ? Again, how will i persist the audit data from the interceptor / listener ? (i.e how do i get a entitymanager for that ? look up the entitymanager factory and get the em ?) Thanx Kevin View the original post :