[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: PLEASE USE THE NEW FORUM

2008-02-16 Thread lauerc
Hi Pete, you should be able to hide your real eMail address from the forum posts, currenty it's not which is too spammer friendly ;-( Regards, Christian View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4129812#4129812 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Web Beans Sneak Peek

2008-02-12 Thread lauerc
Haven't you read the early draft yet? You will not find it there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4128897#4128897 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4128897

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Web Beans Sneak Peek

2008-02-12 Thread lauerc
Hi Norman, great news! I'm really glad to hear about the plans to adopt this upcoming standard in a future release. When do you think we can expect a final realase of the specification and a first flavour of the RI? When you're talking about Seam as a superset of WebBeans what does this

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0.1GA : EJB Blockers with Weblogic 9.x/10.x

2008-02-11 Thread lauerc
Hi again, I've managed to primarily fix the varags problem together with BEA support. Although the seam timer service still doesn't work because of different problem. I've opened a new support case hoping to get this finally fixed. I'll keep you up to date. Best regards, Christian View the

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Web Beans Sneak Peek

2008-02-11 Thread lauerc
Seam has developed very well in the past months, especially regarding depen dency reduction and wider application server support. Nevertheless the gap between the WebBean specification hasn't narrowed since the release of the early specification draft in october. This is quite critical because

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0.1GA : EJB Blockers with Weblogic 9.x/10.x

2008-02-07 Thread lauerc
Hi Guys, in parallel I'm running a support case at BEA. Surprisingly they seem to be on the move to fix the EJB3 compiler bug. I've received a first patch, which didn't fully fix it but it seems they are on a good way. I'll keep you informed about the progress. Regarding the interceptor

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0.1GA : EJB Blockers with Weblogic 9.x/10.x

2008-02-06 Thread lauerc
Hi folks, I'm currently working on the same issues because I'm forced to use BEA WebLogic Server, but like to continue to use JBoss Seam. I've tried to patch the current Seam version (2.0.1.GA) to get one step beyond the known EJB3 compiler problem. This was quite easy because only one single

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0.1GA : EJB Blockers with Weblogic 9.x/10.x

2008-02-06 Thread lauerc
Unfortunately there doesn't seem to exist a possibility to upload attachments into a thread, any ideas how to make my patches available? Regards, Christian View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4127231#4127231 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0.1GA : EJB Blockers with Weblogic 9.x/10.x

2008-02-06 Thread lauerc
Hi guys, finally I've found a way to release the patch ;-) It's attached to this JIRA issue: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2592 Kind regards, Christian View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4127258#4127258 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - What about Web Beans?

2008-02-05 Thread lauerc
We've choosen JBoss Seam in hope to adopt an upcoming standard. Meanwhile it has been getting very silent around the Web Beans specification, even in Gavin's blogs. Is Web Beans a dying spec? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4126543#4126543

[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Type mapping problem with Decimal on DB2/400

2007-07-05 Thread lauerc
I'm trying to manage a table on an DB2/400 with a EJB3 entity bean but Hibernate failes to correctly map the database data type to a data type in the entity bean. The column type is defined as follows: | PREIS DECIMAL(12,5) | When I define the getter like | @Column(name =