If you try to use Seam Remoting running it with SUN's JVM (1.5.08 and 1.5.09)
you get an IllegalAccessError in the InterfaceGenerator class.
| 17:40:44,187 ERROR [[Seam Remoting]] Servlet.service() for servlet Seam
Remoting threw exception
| java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access
Ok, so I finally got a chance to look at this.
SeamTesting pageflow seems to be working fine right now.
However, if navigation is not handled by a jPDL pageflow there's an issue with
conversation propagation in the following scenario:
- Start a FacesRequest with a null conversationId;
- Run an
Yep, that is correct.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3981824#3981824
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3981824
___
jboss-user mailing list
Great news!
I'll try to work on this today and give you some feedback.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3981006#3981006
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3981006
I have just upgraded Seam to 1.1BETA1 and some of my jPDL pageflow unit tests
have stopped working. Here are some issues:
First: if you don't define a 'redirect' tag for each page node, you get a NPE:
Pageflow.java:
|private void navigate(FacesContext context)
|{
| Page
2) I have been bootstrapping the EJB Container myself and setting the
org.jboss.seam.core.Ejb to false in components.xml.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3980795#3980795
Reply to the post :
Good point. This could be related to the problem I am having with SeamTest and
the new 1.1BETA1 version.
I guess one could simply override the SeamTest.init() method and Annotate it
with @Configuration(beforeSuite = true) instead of the
@Configuration(beforeTestClass = true). Don't know how if
This is a known issue not directly related to SEAM but to EJB3:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3071
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3967920#3967920
Reply to the post :