[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: New patch release on 1.4.1

2009-05-09 Thread mjrother
What are the jgroup version dependencies for this version? We are running AS 4.2.3.GA which has 1.4.1SP9. Can I switch to the latest version ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4229850#4229850 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Preloading Large Amounts Of Data

2009-04-17 Thread mjrother
I have a system configuration with n servers. The configuration utilizes invalidation and custom cache loaders (1.4.1). The configuration utilizes the preload option. It takes along time to populate the cache. When the cache is initialized, does the preload operation operate synchronously with

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Various errors showing up when load testing

2009-04-17 Thread mjrother
Since putForExternalRead is not in JBC 1.4.1is using Option Local still the recommended approach? What are the timing issues with that approach? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4226254#4226254 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - CacheListener does not get event if node is not present

2008-08-20 Thread mjrother
I have a distributed cache configuration with a TreeCacheListener on the second system listening for event from the first system. It is configured as INVALIDATION_ASYNC. All works fine while all components remain in memory on the second system. If a node is evicted from the second system or

[jboss-user] [JBossWS] - Web Service Client Classpath

2008-07-10 Thread mjrother
I am using JBossAS 4.2.2.GA. I started with a WSDl and generated classes with wsconsume. I have a web service deployed and can access it from soapUI. I am trying to access from a java application with the generated classes. I keep running into classpath issues. I looked at the wsrunclient.sh

[jboss-user] [JBossWS] - Which Version Of JBossWS for JBoss AS 4.0.4.GA

2008-05-10 Thread mjrother
Which version of JBossWS should I be using for an application on 4.0.4.GA ? I need the ability to generate the java artifacts from the wsdl file. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4149924#4149924 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: Are Stateless Session EJB Thread-safe

2007-12-11 Thread mjrother
Ok...What about the case where I have retrieved a handle to a single instance of a StatelessSessionEJB up front. Then multiple client threads try to invoke methods on the bean. Do they go to multiple EJB's as you suggest? If I look at the MBean for the EJB I only see 2 beans created. View the

[jboss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Are Stateless Session EJB Thread-safe

2007-12-10 Thread mjrother
If I have multiple clients making requests on a single stateless session EJB at the same time what happens ? It is my understanding that EJB's are thread-safe. So does the container place the requests in a queue or what ? Thanks View the original post :

[jboss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Threading EJB Requests Through a Singleton

2007-12-05 Thread mjrother
I am looking at existing code which has a singleton facade class that looks up a stateless session EJB in the constructor and keeps the reference for the life of the program. It is my understanding all EJB's are threadsafe which is enforced by the container. Therefore if multiple client threads

[jboss-user] [JBossWS] - Error With Runtime generation of WSDL With Headers

2006-11-17 Thread mjrother
I have tried this with jboss 4.0.5 native and with jbossws 1.0.4. I have successfully used an annotated stateless ejb for web services with document / literal / bare configuration. I am now attempting to add a header to each web service request. Here is the class : @WebService(name =

[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - EJB3 Soft Delete

2006-09-07 Thread mjrother
I am attempting to accomplish a soft delete of entities without much luck. I have constructed each table to have a column indicating deleted. I would like to be able to mark the object as deleted instead of the DB removal. How can this be accomplished? View the original post :