Heh :)
I stand corrected.
Lior
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4077564#4077564
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4077564
___
jboss-user mailing lis
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : anonymous wrote :
| | After changing to pessimistic locking, our test results have
dramatically improved. It turns out to be a known issue in 1.2.4 SP1.
| |
| What is a known issue? Optimistic locking did not officially exist till
1.3.0. :-)
|
|
:
Hi,
Is there a JIRA issue for this one ?
We too would vote for it :)
For notification purposes, the FQN information is there... at least for the
current notification which is local, the fqn could have been added to the
notification object with no need for extra search.
View the original pos
Hi,
I've been seeing the same exception in a somewhat different scenario, but
perhaps there is a connection, this being the only post mentioning
"null PojoInstance for fqn"...
Basically, I'm running a replciated cache on two different JVMs. One attaches a
POJO and then detaches it, while the o
Thank you for replying.
We have viewed the AOP intoruction webinar and found
NotificationInterceptor.java, but since we are not part of the development
community in JBoss, we still lack the know-how.
Where would you suggest that we begin learning the details ? Any example or
resource would be a
Hi,
We depend on receiving the notification for deletion...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but theoretically, since the deletion is replicated to
all members of the cluster, then every member knows when something is deleted,
and adding a notification should be possible.
We have little use of the cac
Hi,
Thanks for your replies.
What are our alternatives here ?
Lior Neuman
R&D Team
MailVision LTD.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4025002#4025002
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=402
Hi,
We're using 2.0.0ALPHA2 in a standalone app.
We have a PojoCache to which we add a PojoCacheListener, in attempt to log POJO
deletions originating anywhere in the cluster.
It seems that the listener gets called back when POJOs are acted upon on the
local cache, but not when they are acted u
Hi,
Nice nick :)
Did you eventually manage to get it working ?
We're facing problems getting our cache configured to work with Tomcat.
Thanks!
Lior Neuman
R&D Team,
MailVision LTD.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4020015#4020015
Reply to the p
Hi,
So what's the workaround ?
Will GenericTransactionManagerLookup work ?
Can you please give example of how then transactions are obtained ?
Thanks!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019986#4019986
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/in
Hi,
Is there any documentation (like you have for WebSphere) to configure the
cache from a servlet running in Tomcat ?
Tomcat's JNDI is read-only, do you have suggestions or is the above the only
way ?
Thanks !
Lior Neuman
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&
Hi tegman,
We're experiencing the exact same problem (Tomcat's JNDI service is read-only)
Did you solve it eventually ?
Thanks !!
Lior Neuman
R&D Team
MailVision LTD
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4019929#4019929
Reply to the post :
http:/
anonymous wrote : I'd recommend to try it with pessimistic locking. Not sure
how much of the performance impact it will have but I think it does without
further tuning.
After changing to pessimistic locking, our test results have dramatically
improved. It turns out to be a known issue in 1.2.4
Oh... I must have checked in the wrong place then.
I understand that with optimistic locking, these are the results to expect,
please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thank you.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016248#4016248
Reply to the post :
http
Hi,
No, we did not try the pessimistic locking in the test.
Do the above test results seem normal to you, or is there something wrong ?
BTW, at first it was planned to run the wiki test, but it seems to have been
removed from the trunk (last time I checked).
Thank you.
View the original post
We were hoping for an official response for such a question.
Perhaps a light version of the above would help :)
How fast can putObject("Key...", "Value...") be called on a local cache ?
The keys/values are different Strings every time.
Thanks in advance,
Lior Neuman
R&D Team
MailVision LTD
Hi,
Thanks for replying; please see inline.
anonymous wrote : There are many differences in what you tested and the wiki
page.
|
| Mainly, they were testing field updates on attached objects across a
cluster. And you are just testing the speed of attaching objects.
|
Yes, you are righ
Hi,
We have been evaluating JBC for production use in our system, and have decided
to test PojoCache performance on the hardware we intend to use.
Looking for performance data, we came across this performance test:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WhatShouldWeExpectOfThePojoCachePerforma
18 matches
Mail list logo